Christopher K. Gee

10 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Christopher K. Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 20
  • Immunology 97
  • Hematology 40
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 67
Replace Donna A. Chow with:
Donna A. Chow Canada
Sabine Mathieu Germany
Virginia Pearce United States
Eva Kniep Germany
Eszter Lajkó Hungary
María F. Mercogliano Argentina
Salvatore Valvo United Kingdom
Xiaoyan Lu China
Christopher K. Gee relative to Donna A. Chow Canada Donna A. Chow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Donna A. Chow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher K. Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher K. Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher K. Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher K. Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher K. Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher K. Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher K. Gee. The network helps show where Christopher K. Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher K. Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher K. Gee Line = papers co-authored together Christopher K. Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 200386
2 199965
3 199747
4
Rat tumour necrosis factor-alpha: expression in recombinant Pichia pastoris, purification, characterization and development of a novel ELISA.
199945
5 200242
6 199840
7 199636
8
Rat interleukin-10: production and characterisation of biologically active protein in a recombinant bacterial expression system.
200115
9
Application of an in vitro endopeptidase assay for detection of residual toxin activity in tetanus toxoids.
20028
10 20057

About Christopher K. Gee

Christopher K. Gee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Hematology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (2 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Protein purification and stability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (14 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (20 citations), Immunology (97 citations), Hematology (40 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (67 citations). Christopher K. Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cuba and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Adrian F. Bristow, Robin Wait, S. Poole, Christine Ball, Helen L. Ward, G. M. TARRANT, Gwen S. Rees, Chun-Ting Yuen, Christopher Jones and Chun‐Ting Yuen. Their work appears in journals such as Cytokine, Biologicals, Biomedical Chromatography, European Journal of Biochemistry and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact