Christopher E. Kelly

42 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

Christopher E. Kelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Social Psychology 429
  • Urology 104
  • Clinical Psychology 242
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 140
  • Rheumatology 76
Replace Claudia Wiesemann with:
Claudia Wiesemann Germany
Katinka Schweizer Germany
Lisa Campo‐Engelstein United States
Leslie Sadownik Canada
Antonio Aquino Italy
Iván Barrios Paraguay
Verena Schönbucher Switzerland
Doriane Lambelet Coleman United States
Michael Rodi United States
Leah Cahan Schaefer United States
Christopher E. Kelly relative to Claudia Wiesemann Germany Claudia Wiesemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Claudia Wiesemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher E. Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher E. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher E. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher E. Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher E. Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher E. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher E. Kelly. The network helps show where Christopher E. Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher E. Kelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher E. Kelly Line = papers co-authored together Christopher E. Kelly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013113
2
Evaluation of voiding dysfunction and measurement of bladder volume.
200493
3 201570
4 201559
5 201451
6 200840
7 201239
8 201835
9 201433
10 201926
11 201416
12 201314
13 202012
14 202112
15 200512
16 201612
17 201510
18 20199
19 20109
20 20148

About Christopher E. Kelly

Christopher E. Kelly is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Urology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 45 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (22 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (10 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (10 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (6 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (429 citations), Urology (104 citations), Clinical Psychology (242 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (140 citations) and Rheumatology (76 citations). Christopher E. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jeaneé C. Miller, Allison D. Redlich, Steven M. Kleinman, Christian A. Meissner, Wayne N. Welsh, Victor W. Νitti, Benjamin M. Brucker, Melissa B. Russano, Nirit Rosenblum and Sagar Shah. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Public Policy and Law, Criminal Justice and Behavior, Urology, Current Urology Reports and Security Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact