David G. Hunter

205 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

David G. Hunter
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Ophthalmology 510
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 829
  • Classics 119
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 443
  • Religious studies 107
Replace Rafał Płoski with:
Rafał Płoski Poland
Katharina Hüfner Austria
Irma Järvelä Finland
Irwin M. Siegel United States
Mark Borchert United States
Kristina Tarczy‐Hornoch United States
J. F. Geddes United Kingdom
Terry A. Cox United States
Michael G. Stewart United States
William V. Good United States
David G. Hunter relative to Rafał Płoski Poland Rafał Płoski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Rafał Płoski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David G. Hunter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David G. Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David G. Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David G. Hunter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David G. Hunter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David G. Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David G. Hunter. The network helps show where David G. Hunter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David G. Hunter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David G. Hunter Line = papers co-authored together David G. Hunter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 228 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993130
2 2005121
3 2010110
4 198686
5 201381
6 202177
7
The Global Diversity of Taro : Ethnobotany and Conservation
201077
8 198469
9 199561
10 200155
11 201654
12 200853
13 201253
14 201452
15 199951
16 201751
17 201450
18 200149
19 201149
20 200648

About David G. Hunter

David G. Hunter is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 228 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (52 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (48 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (16 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (11 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (10 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (510 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (829 citations), Classics (119 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (443 citations) and Religious studies (107 citations). David G. Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David L. Guyton, Michael X. Repka, Carolyn Wu, Elizabeth C. Engle, Frank L. Kretzer, Michael J. Wan, Gerald A. Fishman, Bharti R. Nihalani, Sarah MacKinnon and Rekha Mehta. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and JAMA Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact