Current Urology Reports

1.8k papers and 23.6k indexed citations

About

The 1.8k papers published in Current Urology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 23.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Urology Reports usually cover Urology (757 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (715 papers) and Surgery (641 papers) specifically the topics of Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (543 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (406 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (354 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Urology Reports are Bhaskar Somani, Laurence Klotz, Kevin T. McVary, Roger R. Dmochowski, Sumeet Bhanvadia, David Staskin, Howard B. Goldman, Michael Palese, Jaspreet S. Sandhu and Daniel A. Shoskes.

In The Last Decade

Current Urology Reports

1.7k papers receiving 23.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Current Urology Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Urology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Urology Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Urology Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Urology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Urology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Urology Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026