Chris Mead

30 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Chris Mead
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Geography, Planning and Development 75
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 130
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 43
  • Atmospheric Science 114
  • Human-Computer Interaction 34
Replace Mark Francek with:
Mark Francek United States
Chris Trevitt Australia
Clare Milsom United Kingdom
Rebecca Whittle United Kingdom
Xibin Han China
Jacky Bourgeois Netherlands
Eugene C. Cordero United States
Benjamin Jones United States
Anthony Carpi United States
Anthony D Feig United States
Chris Mead relative to Mark Francek United States Mark Francek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
Mark Francek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Mead. The network helps show where Chris Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chris Mead Line = papers co-authored together Chris Mead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013116
2 2019114
3 201353
4 201342
5 202030
6 202027
7 202124
8 201818
9 201717
10 201017
11 202313
12
Champion--Joe Louis, black hero in white America
198511
13 20209
14 20177
15 20226
16
Struggle town? Developing profiles of student confusion in simulation-based learning environments
20186
17 20235
18 20174
19 19973
20
Demonstrating the Value of Education Through Exploration as a Theory of Digital Design
20172

About Chris Mead

Chris Mead is a scholar working on Education, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research and Pollution, having authored 32 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mercury impact and mitigation studies (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (3 papers), Career Development and Diversity (3 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (75 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (130 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (43 citations), Atmospheric Science (114 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations). Chris Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ariel D. Anbar, Steven Semken, Sanlyn Buxner, Thomas M. Johnson, Brian J. Majestic, Pierre Herckès, J. R. Lyons, Clifton S. Buck, Alex R. Baker and Andrew R. Bowie. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, CBE—Life Sciences Education, Physical Review Physics Education Research, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and Journal of Learning Analytics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact