Chris Kirk
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Child Welfare and Adoption
- Education top 5%
- Early Childhood Education and Development
- Parental Involvement in Education
Papers in
-
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 5
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 4
- Education 11
- Early Childhood Education and Development 5
- Parental Involvement in Education 4
- Co-authors
- Rhonda K. Lewis (11 shared papers)Alister Jones (3 shared papers)Satish Kumar (5 shared papers)Cecilia Deng (6 shared papers)Kyrah K. Brown (3 shared papers)David Chagné (6 shared papers)Claudia Wiedow (5 shared papers)Lester Brewer (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Tree Genetics & Genomes (4 papers)Horticulture Research (3 papers)Educational Studies (2 papers)Youth & Society (2 papers)Research in Science Education (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandChina
In The Last Decade
Chris Kirk
37 papers receiving 694 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Safety Research 103
- Education 233
- Plant Science 260
- Clinical Psychology 117
- Horticulture 5
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Kirk
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Kirk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Kirk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Kirk. The network helps show where Chris Kirk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chris Kirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 106 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 12 |
About Chris Kirk
Chris Kirk is a scholar working on Plant Science, Education, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Safety Research, having authored 41 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (5 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (4 papers), Community Health and Development (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (4 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (103 citations), Education (233 citations), Plant Science (260 citations), Clinical Psychology (117 citations) and Horticulture (5 citations). Chris Kirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and China. Frequent co-authors include Rhonda K. Lewis, Alister Jones, Satish Kumar, Cecilia Deng, Kyrah K. Brown, David Chagné, Claudia Wiedow, Lester Brewer, Angela Scott and Richard V. Espley. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Genetics & Genomes, Horticulture Research, Educational Studies, Youth & Society and Research in Science Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.