Chin‐Yen Lin

27 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Chin‐Yen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Otorhinolaryngology 44
  • Family Practice 14
  • Strategy and Management 51
  • Communication 23
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Joaquim Gonçalves with:
Joaquim Gonçalves Portugal
Wim Marneffe Belgium
Jungkyu Park South Korea
David D. Dubois United States
Rajnish Jain India
Amir Maleki Iran
Jeremy Albright United States
Karen L. Murrell United States
Sunu Widianto Indonesia
A.C.M. Dumay Netherlands
Chin‐Yen Lin relative to Joaquim Gonçalves Portugal Joaquim Gonçalves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joaquim Gonçalves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chin‐Yen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chin‐Yen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chin‐Yen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chin‐Yen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chin‐Yen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chin‐Yen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chin‐Yen Lin. The network helps show where Chin‐Yen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chin‐Yen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chin‐Yen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chin‐Yen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200797
2 200546
3 200538
4 202120
5 202016
6 20219
7 20218
8 20238
9 20077
10 20226
11 20245
12 20074
13 20094
14 20243
15 20162
16 20232
17 20242
18 20162
19 20082
20 20232

About Chin‐Yen Lin

Chin‐Yen Lin is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (14 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (9 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (4 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (4 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (44 citations), Family Practice (14 citations), Strategy and Management (51 citations), Communication (23 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Chin‐Yen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Tsung‐Hsien Kuo, Martha Biddle, Chia‐Chun Tsai, Yuh‐Shyan Hwang, Trong‐Yen Lee, Muna Hammash, Gia Mudd‐Martin, Debra K. Moser, Jennifer Miller and Debra K. Moser. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, The Journal of Rural Health, Circulation, Heart & Lung and Journal of Cardiac Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact