Cherish Boxall
Impact in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 2
-
- Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds 1
- Co-authors
- Ted Scott (1 shared paper)Zina Eminton (4 shared papers)Jennifer Zelmer (1 shared paper)Laura Desveaux (1 shared paper)Harindra C. Wijeysundera (1 shared paper)Daniela Ziegler (1 shared paper)Darren Larsen (1 shared paper)R. Sacha Bhatia (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Trials (4 papers)Frontiers in Pharmacology (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)JMIR Aging (1 paper)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Cherish Boxall
8 papers receiving 28 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
- Health Informatics 1
- Applied Psychology 3
- Biological Psychiatry 1
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 4
Countries citing papers authored by Cherish Boxall
This map shows the geographic impact of Cherish Boxall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cherish Boxall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cherish Boxall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cherish Boxall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cherish Boxall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cherish Boxall. The network helps show where Cherish Boxall may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cherish Boxall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 |
About Cherish Boxall
Cherish Boxall is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 28 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 paper), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (1 paper), Social Media in Health Education (1 paper), Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds (1 paper), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper), Diversity and Career in Medicine (1 paper) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (1 citation), Applied Psychology (3 citations), Biological Psychiatry (1 citation), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1 citation) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4 citations). Cherish Boxall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Ted Scott, Zina Eminton, Jennifer Zelmer, Laura Desveaux, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Daniela Ziegler, Darren Larsen, R. Sacha Bhatia, Geneviève Rouleau and Rebecca Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, JMIR Aging and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.