Beth Stuart
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
- Epidemiology 41
- Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections 22
- Co-authors
- Michael Moore (64 shared papers)Paul Little (85 shared papers)Lucy Yardley (30 shared papers)Tony Kendrick (13 shared papers)Adam W A Geraghty (22 shared papers)Lidia Panico (2 shared papers)Mark Mullee (12 shared papers)Mark Lown (12 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (24 papers)British Journal of General Practice (12 papers)PLoS ONE (11 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (7 papers)BMJ (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Beth Stuart
161 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 426
- Applied Psychology 197
- Dermatology 277
- General Health Professions 688
- Immunology and Allergy 142
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Stuart
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Stuart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Stuart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Stuart. The network helps show where Beth Stuart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 173 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 170 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 126 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 112 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 82 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 81 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 75 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 67 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 66 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 65 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 65 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 61 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 59 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 57 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 57 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 56 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 52 |
About Beth Stuart
Beth Stuart is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Dermatology, having authored 173 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatology and Skin Diseases (22 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (22 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (22 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (21 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (13 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (11 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (426 citations), Applied Psychology (197 citations), Dermatology (277 citations), General Health Professions (688 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (142 citations). Beth Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Moore, Paul Little, Lucy Yardley, Tony Kendrick, Adam W A Geraghty, Lidia Panico, Mark Mullee, Mark Lown, George Lewith and Geraldine Leydon. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of General Practice, PLoS ONE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.