Ted Scott

426 citations
5 papers · 93 · h-index 3

Impact in

    • Digital Mental Health Interventions
    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
    • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
    • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
    • Health Policy Implementation Science

Papers in

Ted Scott

5 papers receiving 90 citations

Peers

Ted Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • General Health Professions 55
  • Human-Computer Interaction 8
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 2
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 3
Replace Luís Luís with:
Luís Luís Portugal
Regina Ferreira Portugal
Jana Wallace United States
Samantha Field United Kingdom
Melanie Tan Singapore
Mary Steele United Kingdom
Tim Tripp Canada
Claudia Buchweitz Brazil
M. Keurhorst Netherlands
Eric Pittel United States
Ted Scott relative to Luís Luís Portugal Luís Luís's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Luís Luís · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Scott. The network helps show where Ted Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ted Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Scott Line = papers co-authored together Ted Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About Ted Scott

Ted Scott is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Education and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 5 papers that have together received 93 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Indigenous and Place-Based Education (1 paper), Education Systems and Policy (1 paper), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (1 paper) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (29 citations), General Health Professions (55 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (8 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (2 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (3 citations). Ted Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Laura Desveaux, Jeremy Petch, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Darren Larsen, Carolyn Steele Gray, Jennifer Zelmer, Kerry Kuluski, Quỳnh Phạm, Mohamed Ibrahim and Charlene Soobiah. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, BMJ Open, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Australian and International Journal of Rural Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact