Chenhui Ji

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Chenhui Ji
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Biological Psychiatry 52
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 270
  • Neurology 135
  • Neurology 134
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 159
Replace Araceli Dı́az-Ruiz with:
Araceli Dı́az-Ruiz Mexico
Fengshan Yu China
Ying Jun Du China
Young Woo Lee South Korea
Lijie Huang China
Jingyi Huang China
Yazhou Xu China
Midori Kato‐Negishi Japan
Longyu Yang China
Yingzi Liu China
Chenhui Ji relative to Araceli Dı́az-Ruiz Mexico Araceli Dı́az-Ruiz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Araceli Dı́az-Ruiz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chenhui Ji

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chenhui Ji's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chenhui Ji with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chenhui Ji more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chenhui Ji

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chenhui Ji. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chenhui Ji. The network helps show where Chenhui Ji may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chenhui Ji, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chenhui Ji Line = papers co-authored together Chenhui Ji links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016110
2 2018106
3 2017100
4 201592
5 201987
6 201976
7 202072
8 201768
9 201564
10 202159
11 202452
12 202446
13 202442
14 201836
15 202034
16 202429
17 202429
18 201529
19 201822
20 202222

About Chenhui Ji

Chenhui Ji is a scholar working on Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Electrochemistry and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (8 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (5 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (4 papers), Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis (3 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (3 papers), Phase Change Materials Research (3 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (52 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (270 citations), Neurology (135 citations), Neurology (134 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (159 citations). Chenhui Ji has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dongfang Li, Christian Hölscher, Guanglai Li, Guofang Xue, Peng Feng, Shiyong Yu, Beibei Shen, Yuan Ma, Ziyue Yuan and Dong Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Neuropharmacology and ACS Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact