Charles Smith

19 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Charles Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Safety Research 151
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Education 102
  • Social Psychology 58
Replace Gail E. Thomas with:
Gail E. Thomas United States
Lindsey Malcom United States
Joachim Kibirige United States
Dafna Gelbgiser United States
Tania Fisher United Kingdom
Brian McGrath Ireland
Susan Johns Australia
Bryan Maddox United Kingdom
Marcela Román Spain
Margaret Cahalan United States
Charles Smith relative to Gail E. Thomas United States Gail E. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Gail E. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Smith. The network helps show where Charles Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Charles Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Smith Line = papers co-authored together Charles Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201461
2 197745
3 201040
4 199638
5 201338
6 199422
7 200618
8 198717
9 198917
10 201415
11 200911
12 19989
13 19887
14
Understanding the "How" of Quality Improvement: Lessons from the Rhode Island Program Quality Intervention.
20125
15
Points of Light: Third Year Report of the Michigan School Readiness Evaluation.
20004
16
The Outcomes Research in Nursing Administration Project: methodological issues in implementation.
19984
17 19993
18
Final Report on the Palm Beach Quality Improvement System Pilot
20082
19 20191

About Charles Smith

Charles Smith is a scholar working on Safety Research, Education, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Youth Development and Social Support (7 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers), Urban Planning and Valuation (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Management and Marketing Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (151 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations), Education (102 citations) and Social Psychology (58 citations). Charles Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Akiva, Kai S. Cortina, Tom Akiva, Barbara A. Mark, Robert C. Elston, William G. Hill, Stephen C. Peck, Mark Kroll, Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Anne‐Sophie Denault. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Real Estate Research, Nursing Research, American Journal of Community Psychology, Biometrics and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact