Beth Cusatis Phillips

24 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Beth Cusatis Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Leadership and Management 90
  • Research and Theory 144
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 45
  • Family Practice 18
  • General Health Professions 99
Replace Ewa Pilhammar with:
Ewa Pilhammar Sweden
Champion N. Nyoni South Africa
Mary Beth Modic United States
Patricia A. Sharpnack United States
Christine Pintz United States
Ruth A. Wittmann‐Price United States
Joan M. Kavanagh United States
Elizabeth K. Herron United States
Khoon Kiat Tan Singapore
Paula Gubrud-Howe United States
Beth Cusatis Phillips relative to Ewa Pilhammar Sweden Ewa Pilhammar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Ewa Pilhammar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Cusatis Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Cusatis Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Cusatis Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Cusatis Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Cusatis Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Cusatis Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Cusatis Phillips. The network helps show where Beth Cusatis Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Cusatis Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Cusatis Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Beth Cusatis Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017138
2 2014104
3 201635
4 201723
5 202023
6 202020
7 202118
8 202314
9 201013
10 20239
11 20227
12 20076
13 20136
14 20216
15 20216
16 20154
17 20204
18 20163
19 20193
20 20223

About Beth Cusatis Phillips

Beth Cusatis Phillips is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Leadership and Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (13 papers), Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Leadership and Management (90 citations), Research and Theory (144 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (45 citations), Family Practice (18 citations) and General Health Professions (99 citations). Beth Cusatis Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Constance Johnson, Allison Amend Vorderstrasse, Katherine C. Pereira, Carol L. Huston, Pamela R. Jeffries, Catherine M. Todero, Margory A. Molloy, Richard J Sloane, Karen H. Morin and Margaret Jean Carman. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching and learning in nursing, Nurse Educator, Nursing Forum, Nursing Education Perspectives and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact