Beth Cusatis Phillips

24 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Beth Cusatis Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Research and Theory 97
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 28
  • Leadership and Management 19
  • Family Practice 19
  • General Health Professions 200
Replace Ewa Pilhammar with:
Ewa Pilhammar Sweden
Beth Rodgers United States
Ükke Karabacak Türkiye
Ramesh Venkatesaperumal Oman
Elise M. Alverson United States
Mohammadreza Dinmohammadi Iran
Irene Mansutti Italy
Geralyn Meyer United States
Thomas K S Wong Hong Kong
Fiona Geddes Australia
Beth Cusatis Phillips relative to Ewa Pilhammar Sweden Ewa Pilhammar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Ewa Pilhammar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Cusatis Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Cusatis Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Cusatis Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Cusatis Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Cusatis Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Cusatis Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Cusatis Phillips. The network helps show where Beth Cusatis Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Cusatis Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Cusatis Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Beth Cusatis Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017126
2 200895
3 201488
4 201635
5 202021
6 201619
7 202018
8 202117
9 201014
10 202311
11
Clinical Decision Making in Last Semester Senior Baccalaureate Nursing Students
201510
12 20238
13 19808
14 20076
15 20216
16 20156
17 20136
18 20225
19 20204
20 20154

About Beth Cusatis Phillips

Beth Cusatis Phillips is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 28 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (9 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (97 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (28 citations), Leadership and Management (19 citations), Family Practice (19 citations) and General Health Professions (200 citations). Beth Cusatis Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Aimie F. Kachingwe, Constance Johnson, Scott W. Plunkett, Katherine Pereira, Allison Vorderstrasse, Pamela R. Jeffries, Catherine Todero, Carol L. Huston, Margory A. Molloy and Richard Sloane. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Educator, Teaching and learning in nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives, Nursing Forum and Journal of Nursing Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact