Chad Wellmon

485 citations
21 papers · 139 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices 2
    • Education, Literature, Philosophy Research 1

Chad Wellmon

18 papers receiving 114 citations

Peers

Chad Wellmon
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Literature and Literary Theory 38
  • Language and Linguistics 27
  • History and Philosophy of Science 10
  • Linguistics and Language 9
  • Philosophy 20
Replace John Burrows with:
John Burrows Australia
Jean Hébrard France
Marcel Müller Portugal
Georg Stanitzek Luxembourg
David Robey United Kingdom
Brigitte Marin France
Armando Petrucci Italy
Jeffrey M. Peck
Gustave Flaubert Argentina
Dietrich Busse Germany
Chad Wellmon relative to John Burrows Australia John Burrows's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John Burrows · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Wellmon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Wellmon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Wellmon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Wellmon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Wellmon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Wellmon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Wellmon. The network helps show where Chad Wellmon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Chad Wellmon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chad Wellmon Line = papers co-authored together Chad Wellmon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201637
2 202021
3 200818
4 200710
5 20108
6 20177
7
Becoming human : romantic anthropology and the embodiment of freedom
20106
8 20196
9 20155
10
Permanent Crisis: The Humanities in a Disenchanted Age
20215
11
The Rise of the Research University: A Sourcebook.
20173
12 20152
13 20202
14 20152
15 20082
16 20172
17 20111
18 20091
19 20151
20 20220

About Chad Wellmon

Chad Wellmon is a scholar working on Philosophy, Education, Literature and Literary Theory, History and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 21 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Education and Development (2 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (2 papers), Education, Literature, Philosophy Research (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations), Language and Linguistics (27 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations), Linguistics and Language (9 citations) and Philosophy (20 citations). Chad Wellmon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Louis Menand, Chantelle Warner, Claire Kramsch, Mohamed Cheriet, Andrew Piper, Karl S. Guthke, Laura McGrath, Ulrich Gaier, Christian Clément and Ted Underwood. Their work appears in journals such as Representations, Journal of Cultural Heritage, Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, New Literary History and Modern Language Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact