Celia Brazell

1.1k citations
24 papers · 955 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Celia Brazell

22 papers receiving 857 citations

Peers

Celia Brazell
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 107
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 378
  • Pharmacology 120
  • Pharmacology 165
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
Replace M. Ballabio with:
M. Ballabio Italy
Agnieszka Wawrzczak‐Bargieła Poland
T. F. Meert Belgium
Janet A. Clark United States
Hong Nie United States
Kelly M. Standifer United States
Lakhbir Singh United Kingdom
Fu-Hsiung Shen United States
Marcus E. Risner United States
Lucie Sam Dvorakova Australia
Celia Brazell relative to M. Ballabio Italy M. Ballabio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
M. Ballabio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Brazell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Brazell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Brazell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Brazell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Brazell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Brazell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Brazell. The network helps show where Celia Brazell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Brazell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Brazell Line = papers co-authored together Celia Brazell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988160
2 1991122
3 200394
4 200990
5 199286
6 200577
7 198856
8 198949
9 198846
10 200235
11 199235
12 200221
13 199119
14 198916
15 199016
16 19899
17 19916
18 19915
19
20013
20
Administration of aerosol pentamidine: a program design.
19943

About Celia Brazell

Celia Brazell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Pharmacology, Physiology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 955 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (107 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (378 citations), Pharmacology (120 citations), Pharmacology (165 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (24 citations). Celia Brazell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephen M. Stahl, Rammy Gill, François Gilbert, Mark David Tricklebank, John A. Kemp, G.N. Woodruff, Richard Hatfield, Colin Trevor Dourish, Steven J. McClue and Derek N. Middlemiss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychopharmacology, European Journal of Pharmacology, The Pharmacogenomics Journal, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Psychoneuroendocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact