Catherine Van Son

33 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Catherine Van Son
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 35
  • Research and Theory 6
  • Demography 41
  • General Health Professions 73
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 9
Replace Maaike Fobelets with:
Maaike Fobelets Belgium
João Tavares Portugal
Sharon Stahl Wexler United States
Pamela Parsons United States
María del Carmen Malagón-Aguilera Spain
Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs Spain
Cristina Bosch‐Farré Spain
Catherine Tong Canada
Michelle Eslami United States
Meredith Troutman‐Jordan United States
Catherine Van Son relative to Maaike Fobelets Belgium Maaike Fobelets's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Maaike Fobelets · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Van Son

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Van Son's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Van Son with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Van Son more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Van Son

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Van Son. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Van Son. The network helps show where Catherine Van Son may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Van Son, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Van Son Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Van Son links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202142
2 201929
3 201426
4 201821
5 201715
6 201814
7 201314
8 201113
9 201513
10 201810
11 202310
12 20218
13 20168
14 20217
15 20146
16 20206
17 20166
18 20115
19 20105
20 20175

About Catherine Van Son

Catherine Van Son is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Demography, having authored 38 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (2 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (35 citations), Research and Theory (6 citations), Demography (41 citations), General Health Professions (73 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (9 citations). Catherine Van Son has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Maureen Schmitter‐Edgecombe, Cynthia F. Corbett, Pamela J. Wright, Otis L. Owens, Jean F. Wyman, Kathleen Krichbaum, Janet Purath, Joyce Tam, Tamara Odom‐Maryon and Elizabeth Schenk. Their work appears in journals such as The Gerontologist, Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Nursing Education, Nurse Education Today and Journal of Nursing Care Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact