Maaike Fobelets

41 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Maaike Fobelets
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 58
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Demography 50
  • General Health Professions 65
Replace Ángela María Salazar Maya with:
Ángela María Salazar Maya Colombia
Osama Mohamed Elsayed Ramadan Saudi Arabia
Joeri Vermeulen Belgium
Shahin Salarvand Iran
Phyllis N. Horns United States
Lena J. Lee United States
Christina Alexandrou Sweden
Julie‐Anne Fleet Australia
Sue Turner United Kingdom
Konstantinos Antypas Norway
Maaike Fobelets relative to Ángela María Salazar Maya Colombia Ángela María Salazar Maya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Ángela María Salazar Maya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maaike Fobelets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maaike Fobelets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maaike Fobelets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maaike Fobelets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maaike Fobelets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maaike Fobelets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maaike Fobelets. The network helps show where Maaike Fobelets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maaike Fobelets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maaike Fobelets Line = papers co-authored together Maaike Fobelets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202095
2 202029
3 201824
4 201623
5 202020
6 202216
7 201714
8 202114
9 202014
10 201712
11 201912
12 201511
13 202211
14 202011
15 20229
16 20198
17 20237
18 20247
19 20227
20 20236

About Maaike Fobelets

Maaike Fobelets is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physiology and Epidemiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (58 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations), Demography (50 citations) and General Health Professions (65 citations). Maaike Fobelets has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Buyl, Ellen Gorus, Anne Bourbonnais, Marie‐Pierre Gagnon, Koen Putman, Joeri Vermeulen, Anik Giguère, Katrien Beeckman, Idrissa Beogo and Kathleen Lechasseur. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Women and Birth and Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact