Catherine Borbas

1.7k citations
29 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine Borbas

29 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Catherine Borbas
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • General Health Professions 333
  • Family Practice 24
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 33
  • Cancer Research 119
  • Medical Terminology 2
Replace John O. Barron with:
John O. Barron United States
Nrupen Anjan Bhavsar United States
Renee Mentnech United States
Laura–Mae Baldwin United States
Tayana Soukup United Kingdom
Susan DesHarnais United States
Risa Beth Burns United States
Edmondo J. Robinson United States
Roxanne Cosby Canada
Pei‐Tseng Kung Taiwan
Catherine Borbas relative to John O. Barron United States John O. Barron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
John O. Barron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Borbas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Borbas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Borbas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Borbas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Borbas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Borbas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Borbas. The network helps show where Catherine Borbas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Borbas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Borbas Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Borbas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998403
2 2000111
3 200287
4 200285
5 199884
6 199772
7 199870
8
The outcomes of elective laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies.
199564
9 200350
10 200342
11 199940
12 200439
13 200035
14 199732
15 201031
16 200229
17 199426
18 199925
19 200418
20 199714

About Catherine Borbas

Catherine Borbas is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cancer Research and Epidemiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (333 citations), Family Practice (24 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (33 citations), Cancer Research (119 citations) and Medical Terminology (2 citations). Catherine Borbas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Edward Guadagnoli, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Stephen B. Soumerai, Nora Morris, Jane C. Weeks, Fredarick L. Gobel, RICHARD W. ASINGER, Nancy Lynn Keating, Xiaoming Gao and Donald J. Willison. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Care, Cancer and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact