Jane C. Weeks
Impact in
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Ethics in Clinical Research
-
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Papers in
- Oncology 44
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 13
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 25
- Ethics in Clinical Research 10
- Co-authors
- Craig C. Earle (26 shared papers)Jennifer W. Mack (19 shared papers)John Z. Ayanian (16 shared papers)Nancy L. Keating (22 shared papers)Bridget A. Neville (15 shared papers)Susan D. Block (10 shared papers)Joanne Wolfe (15 shared papers)Mary Beth Landrum (13 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (90 papers)Cancer (20 papers)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (14 papers)Medical Care (9 papers)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane C. Weeks
247 papers receiving 24.4k citations
Jane C. Weeks's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 6.8k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 4.0k
- Oncology 5.3k
- Cancer Research 2.1k
- General Health Professions 2.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Jane C. Weeks
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane C. Weeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane C. Weeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane C. Weeks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane C. Weeks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane C. Weeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane C. Weeks. The network helps show where Jane C. Weeks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane C. Weeks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 252 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Relationship Between Cancer Patients' Predictions of Prognosis and Their Treatment Preferences Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 1014 |
| 2 | Patients' Expectations about Effects of Chemotherapy for Advanced Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 839 |
| 3 | Symptoms and Suffering at the End of Life in Children with Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 826 |
| 4 | Trends in the Aggressiveness of Cancer Care Near the End of Life Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 765 |
| 5 | Aggressiveness of Cancer Care Near the End of Life: Is It a Quality-of-Care Issue? Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 735 |
| 6 | Identifying Potential Indicators of the Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care From Administrative Data Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 701 |
| 7 | End-of-Life Discussions, Goal Attainment, and Distress at the End of Life: Predictors and Outcomes of Receipt of Care Consistent With Preferences Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 635 |
| 8 | Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer<SUBTITLE>A Randomized Trial</SUBTITLE> Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 577 |
| 9 | Use of Alternative Medicine by Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 505 |
| 10 | Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 494 |
| 11 | 2012 | 483 | |
| 12 | Associations Between End-of-Life Discussion Characteristics and Care Received Near Death: A Prospective Cohort Study Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 425 |
| 13 | 2000 | 355 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 351 | |
| 15 | Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 332 |
| 16 | 2005 | 321 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 310 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 308 | |
| 19 | End-of-Life Care Discussions Among Patients With Advanced Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 308 |
| 20 | 1997 | 306 |
About Jane C. Weeks
Jane C. Weeks is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Cancer Research and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 252 papers that have together received 25.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (29 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (25 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (19 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (18 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (18 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (11 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (6.8k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (4.0k citations), Oncology (5.3k citations), Cancer Research (2.1k citations) and General Health Professions (2.1k citations). Jane C. Weeks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Craig C. Earle, Jennifer W. Mack, John Z. Ayanian, Nancy L. Keating, Bridget A. Neville, Susan D. Block, Joanne Wolfe, Mary Beth Landrum, Holcombe E. Grier and Paul D. Cleary. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Medical Care and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.