Caroline Conte

1.4k citations
29 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Caroline Conte

27 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Caroline Conte
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Sensory Systems 146
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 364
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 191
  • Molecular Biology 754
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 100
Replace Ken‐ichi Otsuguro with:
Ken‐ichi Otsuguro Japan
Makoto Wakui Japan
Tom Schilling Germany
Samuel J. Fountain United Kingdom
Géza Berecki Australia
Stephanie E. Edelmann United States
Kazuki Harada Japan
Nathalie Éthier Canada
Yoko Fujii Japan
Robert Beattie United Kingdom
Caroline Conte relative to Ken‐ichi Otsuguro Japan Ken‐ichi Otsuguro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Ken‐ichi Otsuguro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Conte. The network helps show where Caroline Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Conte Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Conte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998207
2 2016143
3 199790
4 201786
5 199785
6 200280
7 200375
8 200866
9 199948
10 199747
11 200646
12 200242
13 200436
14 200933
15 200229
16 200826
17 201516
18 200714
19 200814
20 200610

About Caroline Conte

Caroline Conte is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Immunology, Plant Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (5 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (5 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (146 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (364 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (191 citations), Molecular Biology (754 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (100 citations). Caroline Conte has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Newman‐Tancredi, C. Chaput, Pedro J. Andrés-Barquin, Laurence Verrièle, Frank Lezoualc’h, Mark J. Millan, Marion Laudette, Loubina Fazal, Anne Marcuz and Chantal Vaury. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation Research, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Nucleic Acids Research, The EMBO Journal and Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact