Carol E. Smith

22 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Carol E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Library and Information Sciences 11
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 75
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 56
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 18
  • General Health Professions 77
Replace Stephanie Stewart with:
Stephanie Stewart United States
Luiza Isnardi Cardoso Ricardo Brazil
‎Henny Suzana Mediani Indonesia
Narayan Subedi Nepal
Elizabeth M. Hooper United States
Christina Lyons United Kingdom
Evan C. Sommer United States
Deanna L. Reising United States
Joana Elisabete Ribeiro Pinto Guedes Brazil
Hallie Udelson United States
Carol E. Smith relative to Stephanie Stewart United States Stephanie Stewart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Stephanie Stewart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carol E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carol E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carol E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol E. Smith. The network helps show where Carol E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Carol E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carol E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Carol E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199053
2 201246
3 196745
4 201044
5 197043
6 199430
7 200419
8 200115
9 200914
10 200613
11 199613
12 201212
13 20049
14 20067
15
Shaping Supervisory Working Alliance From a Distance
20186
16 20066
17 19995
18 20013
19 19852
20 19782

About Carol E. Smith

Carol E. Smith is a scholar working on Information Systems, General Health Professions, Education, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers) and Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (11 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (75 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (56 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (18 citations) and General Health Professions (77 citations). Carol E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Barbara K. Keogh, Terrie Wetle, Riva Touger‐Decker, Elizabeth Hagan, Marion F. Winkler, Julie O’Sullivan Maillet, Lazelle E. Benefield, Vicki S. Conn, Marlene Z. Cohen and Cindy M. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Disability and Rehabilitation, Nurse Educator and Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact