C. Michael Foley

38 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers

C. Michael Foley
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 239
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 46
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 219
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 157
  • Physiology 161
Replace Paweł Szulczyk with:
Paweł Szulczyk Poland
Nancy E. Sirett New Zealand
N Joels United States
K Mückenhoff Germany
Ewa Koźniewska Poland
Peter Lund Madsen Denmark
Paulina M. Getsy United States
Richard N. Ranson United Kingdom
Sayuri Oshikawa Japan
Verónica A. Campanucci Canada
C. Michael Foley relative to Paweł Szulczyk Poland Paweł Szulczyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Paweł Szulczyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Michael Foley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Michael Foley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Michael Foley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Michael Foley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Michael Foley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Michael Foley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Michael Foley. The network helps show where C. Michael Foley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Michael Foley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Michael Foley Line = papers co-authored together C. Michael Foley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005119
2 199860
3 199851
4 200142
5 200540
6 201339
7 201939
8 199929
9 200826
10 200822
11 200521
12 200620
13 200118
14 200618
15 200617
16 201917
17 200317
18 201316
19 198712
20 200512

About C. Michael Foley

C. Michael Foley is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (12 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (8 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers) and High Altitude and Hypoxia (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (239 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (46 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (219 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (157 citations) and Physiology (161 citations). C. Michael Foley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Eileen M. Hasser, Patrick J. Mueller, Cheryl M. Heesch, Angelina Y. Fong, Jeffrey T. Potts, Ruth L. Stornetta, Julia A. Moffitt, Meredith Hay, R. M. McAllister and M. Harold Laughlin. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, The FASEB Journal, Brain Research, Frontiers in Pharmacology and Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact