John Koerner

33 papers receiving 745 citations

Peers

John Koerner
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 476
  • Small Animals 58
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 80
  • Molecular Biology 300
Replace Henry H. Holzgrefe with:
Henry H. Holzgrefe United States
Tomas Mow Denmark
Bérengère Dumotier Switzerland
Vikrant Vijay United States
Manfred Raschack Germany
Ben G. Small United Kingdom
Rasmus Jansson‐Löfmark Sweden
Peter J.S. Chiu United States
Chantale Simard Canada
Carl J Heneghan United Kingdom
John Koerner relative to Henry H. Holzgrefe United States Henry H. Holzgrefe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Henry H. Holzgrefe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Koerner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Koerner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Koerner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Koerner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Koerner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Koerner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Koerner. The network helps show where John Koerner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Koerner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Koerner Line = papers co-authored together John Koerner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006116
2 202062
3 201751
4 201150
5 201748
6 199146
7 201541
8 201541
9 201939
10 200933
11 200232
12 202228
13 201727
14 201322
15 199121
16 197821
17 201917
18 198210
19 201810
20 201710

About John Koerner

John Koerner is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Small Animals, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (22 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (2 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (476 citations), Small Animals (58 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (78 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (80 citations) and Molecular Biology (300 citations). John Koerner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Syril Pettit, Jean‐Pierre Valentin, Richard C. Dage, Raymond L. Woosley, Michael K. Pugsley, Alexander N. Katchman, Steven N. Ebert, Barbara A. Anderson, Jennifer Pierson and Brian D. Guth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, British Journal of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Frontiers in Pharmacology and Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact