C. Michael Brooks

41 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

C. Michael Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Family Practice 68
  • Pharmacy 81
  • Physiology 343
  • Health Information Management 55
  • General Health Professions 220
Replace Ben Bottema with:
Ben Bottema Netherlands
Michael Whitfield United Kingdom
Carol Gilbert United States
Anna Volerman United States
Shimon Glick Israel
Jan Kavookjian United States
Kimberlydawn Wisdom United States
William T. Basco United States
R. Pill United Kingdom
Satid Thammasitboon United States
C. Michael Brooks relative to Ben Bottema Netherlands Ben Bottema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Ben Bottema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Michael Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Michael Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Michael Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Michael Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Michael Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Michael Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Michael Brooks. The network helps show where C. Michael Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Michael Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Michael Brooks Line = papers co-authored together C. Michael Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994102
2 198972
3 198967
4 198960
5 199359
6 199954
7 198742
8 200235
9 199029
10 199227
11 199226
12 199322
13 198918
14 198817
15 198316
16 200013
17 199413
18
Standardizing contact investigation protocols.
200313
19 201112
20 199212

About C. Michael Brooks

C. Michael Brooks is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Clinical Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (10 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers), Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (4 papers) and Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (68 citations), Pharmacy (81 citations), Physiology (343 citations), Health Information Management (55 citations) and General Health Professions (220 citations). C. Michael Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William C. Bailey, Richard A. Windsor, James Richards, Seng‐Jaw Soong, Connie L. Kohler, Bryn Manzella, Seng-Jaw Soong, Eta S. Berner, James B. Erdmann and Lynn B. Gerald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Asthma, Academic Medicine, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Evaluation & the Health Professions and Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact