John Boker

58 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John Boker
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Family Practice 416
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 932
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 440
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 201
  • Research and Theory 21
Replace Mark Goldszmidt with:
Mark Goldszmidt Canada
Gerard Gormley United Kingdom
Désirée Lie United States
Maya M. Hammoud United States
Jane Kidd United Kingdom
Elizabeth A. Schlenk United States
Neil Johnson United Kingdom
Paul R. Marantz United States
Constance D. Baldwin United States
Ian Williamson United Kingdom
John Boker relative to Mark Goldszmidt Canada Mark Goldszmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Mark Goldszmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Boker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Boker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Boker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Boker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Boker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Boker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Boker. The network helps show where John Boker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Boker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Boker Line = papers co-authored together John Boker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006193
2 2004189
3 2004165
4 2006122
5 2001107
6 200496
7 200675
8 200372
9 198972
10 200569
11 200663
12 200260
13 199645
14 200641
15 200739
16 200538
17 200938
18 200738
19
Immediate impact of an intensive one-week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists.
200836
20 200134

About John Boker

John Boker is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Family Practice and Surgery, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (28 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (10 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (10 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (5 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (416 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (932 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (440 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (201 citations) and Research and Theory (21 citations). John Boker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Désirée Lie, Elizabeth Morrison, Johanna Shapiro, Lloyd Rucker, Michael D. Prislin, Maurice A. Hitchcock, Judy Hollingshead, Carole Warde, Stuart R. Criley and John Michael Criley. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of Endourology, Medical Teacher and BMC Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact