Evaluation & the Health Professions

29.4k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 106
    • Health Policy Implementation Science 109
    • Primary Care and Health Outcomes 103
    • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 101

Evaluation & the Health Professions

1.2k papers receiving 27.0k citations

Peers

Evaluation & the Health Professions
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
  • Family Practice 1.0k
  • General Health Professions 6.9k
  • Applied Psychology 840
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.9k
Replace Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions with:
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions United States
Health Technology Assessment United Kingdom
The Annals of Family Medicine United States
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy United Kingdom
International Journal of Social Research Methodology United Kingdom
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Sweden
Milbank Quarterly United States
Journal of Graduate Medical Education United States
Oncology nursing forum United States
International Journal of Qualitative Methods Canada
Evaluation & the Health Professions relative to Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions United States Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Evaluation & the Health Professions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evaluation & the Health Professions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation & the Health Professions more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions.

About Evaluation & the Health Professions

The 1.3k papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions in the last decades have received a total of 29.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions usually cover Family Practice (112 papers), General Health Professions (550 papers), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (335 papers) and Applied Psychology (55 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (197 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (137 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (109 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (106 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (103 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (101 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (91 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evaluation & the Health Professions are Steve Sussman, Russell E. Glasgow, Timothy P. Johnson, Jonathan B. VanGeest, Lawrence W. Green, Brady T. West, David Cella, Michael T. Kane, Sung Soo Kim and Stan A. Kaplowitz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact