Buddha Dev Paul
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 7
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 4
- Co-authors
- Michael L. Smith (5 shared papers)Eric T. Shimomura (4 shared papers)JOHN McKENNEY MITCHELL (2 shared papers)Aaron J. Jacobs (2 shared papers)Marilyn Ann Huestis (2 shared papers)Leroy D. Mell (1 shared paper)J. D. Irving (1 shared paper)Eric R. W. Knight (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology (3 papers)Clinical Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of Mass Spectrometry (2 papers)Planta Medica (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPakistan
In The Last Decade
Buddha Dev Paul
17 papers receiving 404 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Toxicology 232
- Spectroscopy 133
- Analytical Chemistry 56
- Pharmacology 83
- Emergency Medicine 33
Countries citing papers authored by Buddha Dev Paul
This map shows the geographic impact of Buddha Dev Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Buddha Dev Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buddha Dev Paul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Buddha Dev Paul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Buddha Dev Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Buddha Dev Paul. The network helps show where Buddha Dev Paul may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Buddha Dev Paul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1977 | 2 |
About Buddha Dev Paul
Buddha Dev Paul is a scholar working on Toxicology, Spectroscopy, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Medicinal plant effects and applications (1 paper), Chromium effects and bioremediation (1 paper) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (232 citations), Spectroscopy (133 citations), Analytical Chemistry (56 citations), Pharmacology (83 citations) and Emergency Medicine (33 citations). Buddha Dev Paul has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Michael L. Smith, Eric T. Shimomura, JOHN McKENNEY MITCHELL, Aaron J. Jacobs, Marilyn Ann Huestis, Leroy D. Mell, J. D. Irving, Eric R. W. Knight, George Sosnovsky and Thomas Z. Bosy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Clinical Chemistry, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Planta Medica and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.