Michael L. Smith

117 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Michael L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Toxicology 575
  • Pharmacology 297
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 298
  • Developmental Neuroscience 62
  • Surgery 630
Replace Emanuela Turillazzi with:
Emanuela Turillazzi Italy
Hitoshi Maeda Japan
Irene Riezzo Italy
David R. Fowler United States
Christine E. Wright Australia
Cristoforo Pomara Italy
Kaori Shintani‐Ishida Japan
Lars Slørdal Norway
Takaki Ishikawa Japan
Colin J.D. Ross Canada
Michael L. Smith relative to Emanuela Turillazzi Italy Emanuela Turillazzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Emanuela Turillazzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Smith. The network helps show where Michael L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael L. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Michael L. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016283
2 2005186
3 2006100
4 199591
5 199390
6 201277
7 199970
8 199564
9 200957
10 201056
11 200555
12 200752
13 201250
14 200050
15 201350
16 199649
17 200749
18 201247
19 200743
20 199643

About Michael L. Smith

Michael L. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Toxicology, Pharmacology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 123 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (26 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (14 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (8 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (7 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (4 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (575 citations), Pharmacology (297 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (298 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (62 citations) and Surgery (630 citations). Michael L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Alicia Zollinger, Barry Levine, Marilyn A. Huestis, Rosemarie M. Booze, Robert E. Elliott, Anthony Frempong‐Boadu, Omar Tanweer, Akwasi Boah, Allan J. Barnes and Buddha D. Paul. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Toxicology, World Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques and Forensic Science International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact