Brian Greer

141 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Brian Greer
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.1k
  • Statistics and Probability 1.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Education 1.5k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 59
Replace Robbie Case with:
Robbie Case Canada
Mary K. Hoard United States
Ann Dowker United Kingdom
Drew H. Bailey United States
Maria Chiara Passolunghi Italy
Evelyn H. Kroesbergen Netherlands
Donald L. Compton United States
Johannes E. H. Van Luit Netherlands
Nancy C. Jordan United States
Elsbeth Stern Germany
Brian Greer relative to Robbie Case Canada Robbie Case's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Robbie Case · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Greer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Greer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Greer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Greer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Greer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Greer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Greer. The network helps show where Brian Greer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Greer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Greer Line = papers co-authored together Brian Greer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 152 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997226
2 2007206
3 2006165
4 2015160
5 2018129
6 201698
7 198487
8
The Mathematical Modeling Perspective on Wor(l)d Problems.
199386
9 200979
10 200779
11 201672
12 201571
13 201869
14 201069
15 201964
16 201264
17 200258
18 198758
19 201857
20 201156

About Brian Greer

Brian Greer is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Statistics and Probability and Clinical Psychology, having authored 152 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (81 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (69 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (30 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (21 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (12 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (11 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.1k citations), Statistics and Probability (1.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Education (1.5k citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (59 citations). Brian Greer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Wayne W. Fisher, Lieven Verschaffel, Ashley M. Fuhrman, Daniel R. Mitteer, Erik De Corte, Swapna Mukhopadhyay, Adam M. Briggs, Valdeep Saini, Timothy A. Shahan and Ryan T. Kimball. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Educational Studies in Mathematics and Mathematical Thinking and Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact