Brian Dorn

1.3k citations
46 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Dorn

45 papers receiving 862 citations

Peers

Brian Dorn
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Computer Science Applications 788
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 401
  • Software 92
  • Media Technology 101
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 22
Replace Amber Settle with:
Amber Settle United States
Ursula Wolz United States
Michelle Craig Canada
Orni Meerbaum–Salant Israel
Julian Fernald United States
Brian Hanks United States
Peter Hubwieser Germany
Charles Riedesel United States
Joyce Malyn‐Smith United States
Briana B. Morrison United States
Brian Dorn relative to Amber Settle United States Amber Settle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Amber Settle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Dorn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Dorn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Dorn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Dorn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Dorn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Dorn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Dorn. The network helps show where Brian Dorn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Dorn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Dorn Line = papers co-authored together Brian Dorn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014122
2 201094
3 201577
4 200673
5 201057
6 201350
7 200347
8 201144
9 201637
10 201535
11 201527
12 200426
13 201925
14 201523
15 200423
16 200822
17 201219
18 201918
19 201718
20 201717

About Brian Dorn

Brian Dorn is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Information Systems and Software, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (21 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (14 papers), Online and Blended Learning (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (10 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (5 papers) and Spreadsheets and End-User Computing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (788 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (401 citations), Software (92 citations), Media Technology (101 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (22 citations). Brian Dorn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Mark Guzdial, Allison Elliott Tew, Briana B. Morrison, Dean Sanders, Matthew C. Jadud, Thomas Park, Andrea Forte, Kristin A. Searle, Lauren E. Margulieux and David Sanders. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Science Education, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Communications of the ACM, Computer and ACM Transactions on Computing Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact