Brian Day

29 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

Brian Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Algebra and Number Theory 275
  • Mathematical Physics 451
  • Geometry and Topology 394
  • Human-Computer Interaction 49
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 121
Replace Jiřı́ Rosický with:
Jiřı́ Rosický Czechia
Robert L. Snider United States
Alexander Melnikov New Zealand
Darren A. Narayan United States
С. А. Евдокимов Russia
Myriam Desainte‐Catherine France
James T. Rogers United States
Werner Ehm Germany
Stewart D. Johnson United States
Norman Carey United States
Brian Day relative to Jiřı́ Rosický Czechia Jiřı́ Rosický's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.3×
Jiřı́ Rosický · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Day. The network helps show where Brian Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Day Line = papers co-authored together Brian Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970240
2 1997123
3 197284
4 201838
5 201525
6 197425
7 200323
8 202223
9 197422
10 197319
11 197419
12 201716
13 198015
14 200314
15 201314
16 197410
17 19898
18 20148
19 20158
20
Preference formation in choice experiments (CE): task awareness and learning in the cognitive process.
20048

About Brian Day

Brian Day is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 31 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (15 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (13 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (9 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (3 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (275 citations), Mathematical Physics (451 citations), Geometry and Topology (394 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (49 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (121 citations). Brian Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ross Street, Jeffrey B. Wagman, Christopher C. Pagano, Sabarish V. Babu, Elham Ebrahimi, Peter J. Smith, Francis Borceux, Andrew Robb, J. Scott Jordan and Dawn M. McBride. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Lecture notes in mathematics, Perception, Acta Psychologica and Journal of American College Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact