Applied Categorical Structures

1.0k papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Applied Categorical Structures in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Categorical Structures usually cover Geometry and Topology (597 papers), Mathematical Physics (558 papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (491 papers) specifically the topics of Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (503 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (438 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (343 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Categorical Structures are Reinhold Heckmann, Dirk Hofmann, Bernhard Banaschewski, Walter Tholen, George Janelidze, Maria Manuel Clementino, Dominique Bourn, Ross Street, Jiřı́ Rosický and Marcel Erné.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Categorical Structures

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Categorical Structures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Categorical Structures.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Categorical Structures

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Categorical Structures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Categorical Structures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Categorical Structures more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025