B.L. Goodwin

561 citations
19 papers · 404 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

B.L. Goodwin

18 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

B.L. Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
  • Clinical Biochemistry 43
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 76
  • Biochemistry 36
Replace J.C.R. Fernando with:
J.C.R. Fernando United Kingdom
Lin‐Whei Chuang United States
G.R. Pscheidt United States
Sylvie Huot France
Izyaslav P. Lapin Russia
Aaron Feldstein United States
M. Wolfensberger Switzerland
Paulo Victor Pontes Araújo Brazil
E. Fischer Argentina
Rodolfo Bongiovanni United States
B.L. Goodwin relative to J.C.R. Fernando United Kingdom J.C.R. Fernando's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J.C.R. Fernando · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B.L. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B.L. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.L. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.L. Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B.L. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.L. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.L. Goodwin. The network helps show where B.L. Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside B.L. Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B.L. Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together B.L. Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 197973
2 197965
3 197946
4 197846
5 197841
6 198237
7 199919
8 197816
9 196412
10 197411
11 19758
12 20047
13 19676
14 19756
15 19765
16 19984
17 19941
18 19841
19 19660

About B.L. Goodwin

B.L. Goodwin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Pharmacology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (2 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (68 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (140 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (43 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (76 citations) and Biochemistry (36 citations). B.L. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Sandler, C.R.J. Ruthven, Alec Coppen, V. A. Rama Rao, Gavin P. Reynolds, Henry Field, P. K. Bridges, L. I. Woolf, Andrew J. Lees and G M Stern. Their work appears in journals such as Clinica Chimica Acta, The Lancet, Nature, Biochemical Pharmacology and Clinical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact