Bitna Kim

1.6k citations
75 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

  • Health top 5%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Papers in

Bitna Kim

69 papers receiving 984 citations

Peers

Bitna Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Health 163
  • Clinical Psychology 345
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 153
  • Sociology and Political Science 657
  • Gender Studies 131
Replace Ni He with:
Ni He United States
Gaylene S. Armstrong United States
Brett Garland United States
Jessica C. M. Li Hong Kong
John R. Hepburn United States
Scott D. Camp United States
Stacy H. Haynes United States
Patrick Präg France
Brad W. Smith United States
Marisa Young Canada
Bitna Kim relative to Ni He United States Ni He's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ni He · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bitna Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bitna Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bitna Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bitna Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bitna Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bitna Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bitna Kim. The network helps show where Bitna Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bitna Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bitna Kim Line = papers co-authored together Bitna Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200992
2 201582
3 201356
4 201455
5 201143
6 201634
7 201933
8 201333
9 202030
10 202127
11 201227
12 202026
13 201823
14 201322
15 201922
16 201921
17 202320
18 201420
19 201919
20 201019

About Bitna Kim

Bitna Kim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Health, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (30 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (25 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (17 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (14 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (9 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (8 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (163 citations), Clinical Psychology (345 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (153 citations), Sociology and Political Science (657 citations) and Gender Studies (131 citations). Bitna Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Alida V. Merlo, Nancy L. Hogan, Eric G. Lambert, Jurg Gerber, Holly A. Miller, Peter J. Benekos, Nathan E. Kruis, Thomas M. Kelley, Yeong-hee Kim and Youngki Woo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Criminal Justice, Trauma Violence & Abuse, Police Quarterly, Journal of Crime and Justice and Journal of Criminal Justice Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact