Nathan E. Kruis

45 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Nathan E. Kruis
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Health 79
  • Clinical Psychology 112
  • Social Psychology 112
  • Sociology and Political Science 232
  • General Energy 5
Replace Stephen Tomsen with:
Stephen Tomsen Australia
Bernadette Sebar Australia
Kayla Fontenot United States
Sébastien Tutenges Denmark
Ashley Edwards Canada
Joan Abbott‐Chapman Australia
Dean A. Dabney United States
Christa Fouché New Zealand
Adele Cox Australia
Kahryn Hughes United Kingdom
Nathan E. Kruis relative to Stephen Tomsen Australia Stephen Tomsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Stephen Tomsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan E. Kruis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan E. Kruis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan E. Kruis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan E. Kruis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan E. Kruis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan E. Kruis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan E. Kruis. The network helps show where Nathan E. Kruis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Nathan E. Kruis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan E. Kruis Line = papers co-authored together Nathan E. Kruis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014134
2 201938
3 202034
4 202134
5 202031
6 201829
7 202122
8 202219
9 202319
10 201916
11 202016
12 202114
13 202014
14 202014
15 202013
16 201912
17 202112
18 202010
19 202310
20 202010

About Nathan E. Kruis

Nathan E. Kruis is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 48 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (14 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (9 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (9 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (79 citations), Clinical Psychology (112 citations), Social Psychology (112 citations), Sociology and Political Science (232 citations) and General Energy (5 citations). Nathan E. Kruis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Jaeyong Choi, Nicholas James Rowland, Bitna Kim, Katherine J. McLean, Julak Lee, Jennifer Murphy, Alida V. Merlo, Ilhong Yun, Övgü Kaynak and Teresa A. Cardon. Their work appears in journals such as Crime & Delinquency, Substance Use & Misuse, American Journal of Criminal Justice, Journal of Criminal Justice Education and Children and Youth Services Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact