Countries where authors publish in Trauma Violence & Abuse
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trauma Violence & Abuse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trauma Violence & Abuse more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse
This network shows the impact of papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse.
About Trauma Violence & Abuse
The 1.5k papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse in the last decades have received a total of 64.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Trauma Violence & Abuse usually cover Health (720 papers), Clinical Psychology (840 papers), Gender Studies (389 papers), Sociology and Political Science (556 papers) and Safety Research (91 papers) specifically the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (689 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (523 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (336 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (188 papers), Sex work and related issues (152 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (122 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (116 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trauma Violence & Abuse are Michael T. Ungar, Naomi Breslau, Emily R. Dworkin, Katie M. Edwards, Laura C. Wilson, Rebecca Campbell, Ko Ling Chan, Ann L. Coker, John P. Wilson and Rebecca J. Macy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.