Benjamin W. Booth

4.8k citations
15 papers · 629 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 9
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 3
    • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 2
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 3

Benjamin W. Booth

15 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Benjamin W. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Aging 28
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 153
  • Molecular Biology 454
  • Cell Biology 78
  • Insect Science 35
Replace Aleksandar Necakov with:
Aleksandar Necakov Canada
Isabel Almudí Spain
Giulia Antonazzo United Kingdom
Sofia Grammenoudi Greece
Raghuvir Viswanatha United States
Theodore Busby United States
Daniel Vasiliauskas United States
Bénédicte Franco Belgium
François Juge France
Nicole C. Grieder Switzerland
Benjamin W. Booth relative to Aleksandar Necakov Canada Aleksandar Necakov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Aleksandar Necakov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin W. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin W. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin W. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin W. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin W. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin W. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin W. Booth. The network helps show where Benjamin W. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin W. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin W. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin W. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2015284
2 2010179
3 201564
4 201443
5 202121
6 201815
7 20205
8 20175
9 20184
10 20173
11 20172
12 20231
13 20171
14 20171
15 20201

About Benjamin W. Booth

Benjamin W. Booth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Genetics, Food Science and Insect Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (2 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (28 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (153 citations), Molecular Biology (454 citations), Cell Biology (78 citations) and Insect Science (35 citations). Benjamin W. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Roger A. Hoskins, S Celniker, Kenneth H. Wan, Koen J. T. Venken, Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal, Megan E. Campbell, Robert Levis, Manuel Cantu Gutierrez, Pei-Tseng Lee and Hugo J. Bellen. Their work appears in journals such as Genome Research, Nature Biotechnology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Genetics and eLife.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact