Benjamin Forbes

13 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Benjamin Forbes's Hit Papers

Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up 2017 · 646 citations
6460+3+6Years since publication200400600

Peers

Benjamin Forbes
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Biological Psychiatry 78
  • Clinical Psychology 614
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 316
  • Organic Chemistry 417
  • Pharmaceutical Science 75
Replace Frank M. Orson with:
Frank M. Orson United States
Michael Chan United States
Soichiro Sato Japan
Georgette D. Kanmogne United States
Wei Qu China
Xueqi Wang China
Joris Kloek Netherlands
Susan M. Hancock Canada
Hanna Hartmann Germany
Stephanie McGrath United States
Benjamin Forbes relative to Frank M. Orson United States Frank M. Orson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Frank M. Orson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Forbes. The network helps show where Benjamin Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Forbes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Forbes Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Forbes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up
Hit paper breakdown →
2017646
2 2011191
3 2012117
4 2011102
5 201582
6 201581
7 200872
8 201051
9 200931
10 201329
11 201910
12 19943
13 20251

About Benjamin Forbes

Benjamin Forbes is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (4 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (3 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers), Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (2 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (78 citations), Clinical Psychology (614 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (316 citations), Organic Chemistry (417 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (75 citations). Benjamin Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Pilling, Robin Carhart‐Harris, David Erritzøe, Mark Bolstridge, Michael Bloomfield, David Taylor, Camilla Day, Mendel Kaelen, Valerie H. Curran and Amanda Feilding. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Frontiers in Immunology and Journal of Cystic Fibrosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact