Peter Marsh

1.9k citations
36 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus 7
    • Reproductive tract infections research 8
    • Microbial infections and disease research 3

Peter Marsh

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Microbiology 170
  • Clinical Biochemistry 105
  • Molecular Medicine 75
  • Infectious Diseases 242
  • Endocrinology 61
Replace Dona Foster with:
Dona Foster United Kingdom
Faye A. Hartmann United States
Jaber Aslanzadeh United States
T. Ulf Westblom United States
Peter Tilley Canada
Ortrud Zimmermann Germany
Mark P. Simons United States
Odile Bajolet France
Philip H. Jones United Kingdom
Áine Fox Ireland
Peter Marsh relative to Dona Foster United Kingdom Dona Foster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Dona Foster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Marsh. The network helps show where Peter Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Marsh Line = papers co-authored together Peter Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013138
2 2012118
3 2011103
4 2013102
5 199474
6 201066
7 201437
8 201236
9 201333
10 199830
11 201330
12 200627
13 201227
14 201024
15 200021
16 200320
17 201218
18 197718
19 201415
20 202013

About Peter Marsh

Peter Marsh is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive tract infections research (8 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (7 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (5 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (5 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (170 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (105 citations), Molecular Medicine (75 citations), Infectious Diseases (242 citations) and Endocrinology (61 citations). Peter Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth M. H. Wellington, Geraint B. Rogers, Kenneth D. Bruce, Franziska A. Stressmann, Lucas R. Hoffman, Ian N. Clarke, Mary P. Carroll, T. Daniels, Nilesh Patel and Benjamin Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Microbiology, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, PLoS ONE, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis and BMC Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact