Andrew Tuck

2.2k citations
56 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Tuck

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Andrew Tuck
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Archeology 121
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 330
  • Emergency Medical Services 66
  • Microbiology 58
  • Clinical Psychology 169
Replace Michael Curry with:
Michael Curry United States
Joan Phelan United States
A.M. Davies Israel
Elizabeth R. Boskey United States
Robert M. Lawrence United States
Maryline Laude-Sharp United States
Nicholas D. Walter United States
Lael M. Yonker United States
Emily A. Knapp United States
Richard Loh Australia
Andrew Tuck relative to Michael Curry United States Michael Curry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40.3×
Michael Curry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Tuck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Tuck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Tuck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Tuck. The network helps show where Andrew Tuck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Tuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Tuck Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Tuck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017141
2 2011103
3 200873
4
Localization of platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor expression in the periepithelial stroma of human breast carcinoma.
199672
5 201767
6 201762
7 201250
8 200947
9 201543
10 201542
11 201742
12 201539
13 201729
14 201829
15 201628
16 201825
17 201623
18 201523
19 201420
20 201920

About Andrew Tuck

Andrew Tuck is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Health and Strategy and Management, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (8 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (121 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (330 citations), Emergency Medical Services (66 citations), Microbiology (58 citations) and Clinical Psychology (169 citations). Andrew Tuck has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Kwame McKenzie, John Albanese, Stuart C. Clarke, Tom Wilkinson, Karl J. Staples, Branka Agic, Kristoffer Ostridge, Kelly K. Anderson, Nicholas Williams and Simon Bourne. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, BMJ Open, Forensic Science International, BMC Psychiatry and Respiratory Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact