Bea Spek

22 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Bea Spek
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Parasitology 87
  • Occupational Therapy 24
  • Family Practice 9
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Research and Theory 2
Replace Virgilio E. Failoc‐Rojas with:
Virgilio E. Failoc‐Rojas Peru
Megan Armstrong United States
Malin Kark Sweden
Catelyn Richards Australia
M. F. F. Lima e Costa Brazil
Hyunmi Son South Korea
Hassan Bella Saudi Arabia
Lucile Malard France
Leo Kawaguchi Japan
Hugh Cross United Kingdom
Bea Spek relative to Virgilio E. Failoc‐Rojas Peru Virgilio E. Failoc‐Rojas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Virgilio E. Failoc‐Rojas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bea Spek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bea Spek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bea Spek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bea Spek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bea Spek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bea Spek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bea Spek. The network helps show where Bea Spek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bea Spek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bea Spek Line = papers co-authored together Bea Spek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201598
2 201332
3 201931
4 201928
5 201723
6
Development and validation of an assessment instrument for teaching evidence-based practice to students in allied health care: the Dutch Modified Fresno.
201217
7 202013
8 201913
9 202012
10 202110
11 20137
12 20197
13 20217
14 20214
15 20202
16 20232
17 20222
18 20242
19 20242
20 20221

About Bea Spek

Bea Spek is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (1 paper), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Parasites and Host Interactions (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper) and Disaster Response and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (87 citations), Occupational Therapy (24 citations), Family Practice (9 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Bea Spek has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Cees Lucas, Nynke van Dijk, Eleanor Ochodo, Katja Polman, Johannes B. Reitsma, Poppy H. L. Lamberton, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Lisette van Lieshout, Mariska Leeflang and Patrick M. Bossuyt. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Nurse Education Today, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact