Bea Spek

22 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Bea Spek
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 30
  • Parasitology 85
  • Family Practice 19
  • Occupational Therapy 27
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Francisco Javier Pérez‐Rivas with:
Francisco Javier Pérez‐Rivas Spain
Hyunmi Son South Korea
Elizabeth M. Norman United States
Virgilio E. Failoc‐Rojas Peru
Sunil Deepak Italy
Emanuella Silva Joventino Brazil
Harald Reiso Norway
Ilda de Godoy Brazil
Blanca Marín Fernández Spain
Robert D. Schremmer United States
Bea Spek relative to Francisco Javier Pérez‐Rivas Spain Francisco Javier Pérez‐Rivas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Francisco Javier Pérez‐Rivas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bea Spek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bea Spek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bea Spek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bea Spek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bea Spek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bea Spek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bea Spek. The network helps show where Bea Spek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bea Spek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bea Spek Line = papers co-authored together Bea Spek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201594
2 201332
3 201929
4 201927
5 201722
6
Development and validation of an assessment instrument for teaching evidence-based practice to students in allied health care: the Dutch Modified Fresno.
201217
7 202013
8 202012
9 201911
10 20219
11 20197
12 20217
13 20137
14 20213
15 20242
16 20232
17 20242
18 20202
19 20222
20 20231

About Bea Spek

Bea Spek is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers) and Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (30 citations), Parasitology (85 citations), Family Practice (19 citations), Occupational Therapy (27 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Bea Spek has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Cees Lucas, Nynke van Dijk, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Eleanor Ochodo, Poppy H. L. Lamberton, Lisette van Lieshout, Katja Polman, Margreet Wieringa‐de Waard, Patrick M. Bossuyt and Johannes B. Reitsma. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, Journal of Clinical Medicine and European Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact