Corrie E. Erasmus

105 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Corrie E. Erasmus
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Neurology 616
  • Speech and Hearing 223
  • Genetics 350
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 394
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 300
Replace Anne‐Dorte Sperfeld with:
Anne‐Dorte Sperfeld Germany
Nicholas Elwood Johnson United States
Carolyn M. Constantin United States
Chad Rydel Heatwole United States
Franco Gemignani Italy
David D. Kilmer United States
Joost Raaphorst Netherlands
Lucinda Carr United Kingdom
Edmar Zanoteli Brazil
Martin K. Childers United States
Corrie E. Erasmus relative to Anne‐Dorte Sperfeld Germany Anne‐Dorte Sperfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.9×
Anne‐Dorte Sperfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Corrie E. Erasmus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corrie E. Erasmus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corrie E. Erasmus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corrie E. Erasmus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Corrie E. Erasmus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Corrie E. Erasmus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Corrie E. Erasmus. The network helps show where Corrie E. Erasmus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Corrie E. Erasmus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Corrie E. Erasmus Line = papers co-authored together Corrie E. Erasmus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016250
2 2012150
3 2011103
4 201096
5 200996
6 201274
7 201573
8 201068
9 200967
10 201566
11 200854
12 198251
13 201350
14 201750
15 202147
16 201845
17 199242
18 202042
19 201641
20 201937

About Corrie E. Erasmus

Corrie E. Erasmus is a scholar working on Neurology, Speech and Hearing, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 114 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (27 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (21 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (14 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (13 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (12 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (9 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (8 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (616 citations), Speech and Hearing (223 citations), Genetics (350 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (394 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (300 citations). Corrie E. Erasmus has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karen van Hulst, Lenie van den Engel-Hoek, Peter H. Jongerius, Imelda J. M. de Groot, Frank J. A. van den Hoogen, Bert J. M. De Swart, Jan J. Rotteveel, Nicol Cornelia Voermans, Baziel G.M. van Engelen and P.H. Jongerius. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromuscular Disorders, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Neurology, Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases and European Journal of Paediatric Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact