Barbara Thomas

48 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Barbara Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Research and Theory 27
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 22
  • Urology 37
  • General Health Professions 94
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Elaine Denny with:
Elaine Denny United Kingdom
Jurate A. Sakalys United States
Heather Gibb Australia
CeCelia R. Zorn United States
Laura Dempsey Ireland
Sharon L. Sims United States
Ian McGrath Australia
Cheryl Kipping United Kingdom
Brigid Lusk United States
Linda Ward United States
Barbara Thomas relative to Elaine Denny United Kingdom Elaine Denny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Elaine Denny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Thomas. The network helps show where Barbara Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200787
2 198943
3 199333
4
The Internet: an effective tool for nursing research with women.
200025
5 200220
6 198320
7
Working women identify influences and obstacles to breast health practices.
200018
8
Nursing Research: An Experiential Approach
199018
9 199616
10 199516
11 200016
12 198013
13 197913
14 198612
15 200211
16 197711
17 19949
18 20169
19 19908
20 19698

About Barbara Thomas

Barbara Thomas is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Epidemiology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (3 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (27 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (22 citations), Urology (37 citations), General Health Professions (94 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Barbara Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert Schoen, Ieuan A. Hughes, Claire Nihoul‐Feketé, Peggy T. Cohen–Kettenis, Kathryn D. Lafreniere, Lynnette Leeseberg Stamler, D. M. Kane, Bill Snider, Sharon McMahon and Mary Drake. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, Nursing Research, Journal of Nursing Education, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact