Ashley Young

15 papers receiving 688 citations

Peers

Ashley Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Cell Biology 93
  • Ecological Modeling 24
  • Physiology 24
  • Toxicology 15
Replace Laurie A. Smith with:
Laurie A. Smith United States
Dawn White Canada
Alexander Wolf Germany
Diana Wang United States
Stephanie Richards United States
Eric Schmitt United States
Harold Lee United States
Sarah Decker Germany
Morris Fiddler United States
Susan Cook United Kingdom
Ashley Young relative to Laurie A. Smith United States Laurie A. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Laurie A. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ashley Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ashley Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashley Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashley Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ashley Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashley Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashley Young. The network helps show where Ashley Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ashley Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ashley Young Line = papers co-authored together Ashley Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2012144
2 2011142
3 201075
4 201165
5 201754
6 201644
7 201835
8 201134
9 202029
10 201820
11 201320
12 201310
13 201510
14 202010
15 20223
16
Economic evaluation of the Heart Protection Study
20030
17 20240

About Ashley Young

Ashley Young is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (1 paper), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (1 paper) and Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (30 citations), Cell Biology (93 citations), Ecological Modeling (24 citations), Physiology (24 citations) and Toxicology (15 citations). Ashley Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jean H. Overmeyer, William A. Maltese, Haymanti Bhanot, Brendon M. H. Larson, Paul Erhardt, Jonathan T. Shemwell, Daniel K. Capps, AliceAnn Crandall, Chad A. Newton and Christine Kim Garcia. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Journal of Science Education and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact