Michael C. Goates

20 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Michael C. Goates
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 41
  • Health 75
  • Library and Information Sciences 7
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 4
  • Applied Psychology 16
Replace Lisa Carver with:
Lisa Carver Canada
Anna Wong Hong Kong
Adina Wagner Germany
Ilaria Giovannelli Italy
Martin Malcolm United Kingdom
Elizabeth Collins United States
Qiao Wu United States
Chi-Leung Kwok Hong Kong
Ningxin Wang United States
Julia R Pozuelo United Kingdom
Michael C. Goates relative to Lisa Carver Canada Lisa Carver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Lisa Carver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Goates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Goates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Goates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Goates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Goates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Goates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Goates. The network helps show where Michael C. Goates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Goates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael C. Goates Line = papers co-authored together Michael C. Goates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202067
2 201742
3 201835
4 202331
5 201624
6 200719
7 202319
8 202017
9 201715
10 20176
11 20244
12 20204
13 20184
14 20183
15 20172
16 20212
17 20231
18 20221
19
Poster Competitions: Teaching Effective Scholarly Communication
20181
20 20171

About Michael C. Goates

Michael C. Goates is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (2 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (2 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (41 citations), Health (75 citations), Library and Information Sciences (7 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (4 citations) and Applied Psychology (16 citations). Michael C. Goates has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mat D. Duerden, Evan L. Thacker, Eric K. Layland, Michael Barnes, Camilla J. Hodge, Xiaoyue Niu, Gregory M. Nelson, Dennis L. Eggett, M. Lelinneth B. Novilla and Kent A. Hatch. Their work appears in journals such as College & Research Libraries, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Innovation in Aging, Annals of Leisure Research and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact