Åsa Roxberg

30 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Åsa Roxberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
  • Conservation 24
  • Health 48
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Clinical Psychology 99
Replace Catherine Buckley with:
Catherine Buckley Ireland
Aravind Komuravelli United Kingdom
Oscar Tranvåg Norway
Ruth Eley United Kingdom
Huimin Xiao China
Zohreh Khoshnood Iran
Lynn Bunch O'Neill United States
Hilary Tetlow United Kingdom
Katherine J. Roberts United States
Brandy Renee McCann United States
Åsa Roxberg relative to Catherine Buckley Ireland Catherine Buckley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Catherine Buckley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Åsa Roxberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Åsa Roxberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Åsa Roxberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Åsa Roxberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Åsa Roxberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Åsa Roxberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Åsa Roxberg. The network helps show where Åsa Roxberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Åsa Roxberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Åsa Roxberg Line = papers co-authored together Åsa Roxberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200931
2 201230
3 201028
4 201326
5 201024
6 201722
7 201619
8
Validity and reliability of a Swedish version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): a pilot study.
201019
9 201216
10 201015
11 201612
12 201411
13 20089
14 20188
15 20147
16 20176
17 20126
18 20136
19 20185
20 20175

About Åsa Roxberg

Åsa Roxberg is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), Conservation (24 citations), Health (48 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations) and Clinical Psychology (99 citations). Åsa Roxberg has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include António Barbosa da Silva, Kjell Kristoffersen, Jan Henrik Rosland, Sidsel Ellingsen, Herdis Alvsvåg, Bengt Fridlund, Margareta Asp, David Brunt, Cristina Lundqvist‐Persson and Ingrid Larsson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, Journal of Religion and Health, Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, Journal of Holistic Nursing and Journal of Aging Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact