International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
982 papers
receiving
20.3k citations
Peers
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
Clinical Psychology5.2k
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology317
Research and Theory177
General Health Professions5.1k
Health1.3k
Replace Qualitative Research with:
Qualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom
International Journal of Social Research MethodologyUnited Kingdom
Journal of Transcultural NursingUnited States
International Journal of Qualitative MethodsCanada
Social Work in Health CareUnited States
Perspectives In Psychiatric CareTürkiye
Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and MedicineUnited Kingdom
Family & Community HealthUnited States
The Journal of Rural HealthUnited States
Clinical Nursing ResearchUnited States
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Beingrelative toQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomQualitative Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Qualitative Research · 1×
×0.95k/5kCP
×1.6317/204NPP
×1.6177/111RT
×0.65k/8kGHP
×0.91k/2kHEALT
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being.
About International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
The 1.4k papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being in the last decades have received a total of 29.9k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being usually cover Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (26 papers), Clinical Psychology (267 papers), General Health Professions (297 papers), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (51 papers) and Pharmacy (45 papers) specifically the topics of Health, psychology, and well-being (72 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (64 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (50 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (45 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (42 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (41 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (40 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being are Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun, Ulrika E. Hallberg, Lotta Dellve, Eva Brink, Gunilla Klingberg, Kajsa Henning Abrahamsson, Kerstin Wentz, Karin Dahlberg and Lillemor R.‐M. Hallberg.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.