Stella Black

884 citations
37 papers · 498 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Stella Black

37 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Stella Black
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 23
  • Health 78
  • Clinical Psychology 119
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 123
  • General Health Professions 101
Replace Berit Sæteren with:
Berit Sæteren Norway
Ken Hok Man Ho Hong Kong
Andrea Huseth‐Zosel United States
Oscar Tranvåg Norway
Cheryl Delgado United States
Åsa Roxberg Sweden
Ashley Macleod Australia
Bettina Stenbock‐Hult Finland
Bienke Janssen Netherlands
Synnøve Caspari Norway
Stella Black relative to Berit Sæteren Norway Berit Sæteren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Berit Sæteren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stella Black

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stella Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stella Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stella Black more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stella Black

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stella Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stella Black. The network helps show where Stella Black may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stella Black, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stella Black Line = papers co-authored together Stella Black links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201962
2 201338
3 201734
4 200730
5 201926
6 195225
7 201924
8 201723
9 201821
10 201820
11 201919
12 202017
13 201617
14 201516
15 201913
16 202212
17 201612
18 201312
19
Differences in New Zealand Secondary School Students' Reported Strengths and Difficulties
201011
20 201811

About Stella Black

Stella Black is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Health and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (23 citations), Health (78 citations), Clinical Psychology (119 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (123 citations) and General Health Professions (101 citations). Stella Black has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Merryn Gott, Tess Moeke‐Maxwell, Lisa Williams, Janine Wiles, Tessa Morgan, Hong‐Jae Park, Ofa Dewes, M. Mooney, Amanda Wheeler and Grant Christie. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Palliative Medicine, BMC Palliative Care, Aging & Mental Health and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact