Arjaan Wit

14 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Arjaan Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Safety Research 242
  • General Decision Sciences 38
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Sociology and Political Science 297
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 73
Replace Natalia Montinari with:
Natalia Montinari Italy
Sebastian Lotz Germany
Sandy Bogaert Belgium
Russell N. James United States
Kirstin C. Appelt United States
Yating Chuang Taiwan
Irene Blanken Netherlands
Lorenz Götte Switzerland
Alexander Vostroknutov Netherlands
Jan Stoop Netherlands
Arjaan Wit relative to Natalia Montinari Italy Natalia Montinari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Natalia Montinari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arjaan Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arjaan Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arjaan Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arjaan Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arjaan Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arjaan Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arjaan Wit. The network helps show where Arjaan Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Arjaan Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arjaan Wit Line = papers co-authored together Arjaan Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200089
2 199885
3 200579
4 199653
5 200750
6 200337
7 200833
8
The presentation of rewards and punishments in a simulated social dilemma.
199032
9 198826
10 200819
11 200910
12 20186
13 20024
14 20151

About Arjaan Wit

Arjaan Wit is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (1 paper) and Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (242 citations), General Decision Sciences (38 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Sociology and Political Science (297 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (73 citations). Arjaan Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Henk Wilke, David De Cremer, Erik W. de Kwaadsteniet, Eric van Dijk, Henk Staats, Esther van Leeuwen, Eric van Dijk, Riël C. Vermunt, Kees van den Bos and E. Allan Lind. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Economic Psychology, Leadership and Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact