Jan Stoop

710 citations
14 papers · 384 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Stoop

14 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Jan Stoop
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • General Decision Sciences 75
  • Safety Research 249
  • Demography 61
  • Applied Psychology 17
  • Information Systems and Management 26
Replace Michalis Drouvelis with:
Michalis Drouvelis United Kingdom
Frédéric Schneider United Kingdom
Raúl López‐Pérez Spain
Fanmin Kong United States
Roel van Veldhuizen Germany
Conny Wollbrant Sweden
Daniel Navarro‐Martinez Spain
Martin Jones United Kingdom
E. Glenn Dutcher United States
Silvia Sonderegger United Kingdom
Jan Stoop relative to Michalis Drouvelis United Kingdom Michalis Drouvelis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michalis Drouvelis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Stoop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Stoop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Stoop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Stoop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Stoop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Stoop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Stoop. The network helps show where Jan Stoop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jan Stoop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Stoop Line = papers co-authored together Jan Stoop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201682
2 202169
3 201269
4 201346
5 201428
6 201521
7 202019
8 201519
9 202110
10 20238
11 20136
12 20175
13 20121
14 20241

About Jan Stoop

Jan Stoop is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences, Demography and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (11 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (75 citations), Safety Research (249 citations), Demography (61 citations), Applied Psychology (17 citations) and Information Systems and Management (26 citations). Jan Stoop has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Daan van Soest, Charles Noussair, Jan Potters, Nikos Nikiforakis, James Andreoni, Jana Vyrastekova, Romain Espinosa, John A. List, Minah Jung and Joachim Vosgerau. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Economics, European Economic Review, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Management Science and American Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact